|
|
|
雲頂林氏家族爭產風波再升級！ 姐姐訴弟弟 14天不轉股份 將索賠20.6億 ! 2017/4/2 （八打靈再也1日訊）英文財經周刊《The Edge》報導，雲頂集團的林氏家族爭產風波再升級！
因信託基金和遺囑受益人問題掀起侄兒女起訴叔叔後，雲頂集團主席兼總執行長丹斯里林國泰這次遭到三姐林秀瓊起訴。
根據報導指出，丹斯里林梧桐女兒林秀瓊已入稟法庭，起訴胞弟丹斯里林國泰及建發實業私人有限公司（Kien Huat Realty）。
Genting Berhad is 39.8% owned by Kien Huat Realty Sdn Bhd, a private company controlled by the late Tan Sri (Dr.) Lim Goh Tong’s family.
林秀瓊宣稱建發實業是在她委託下，持有雲頂集團的股份，所以她才是股份受益擁有者，因此要求法庭宣判建發實業所持有的雲頂集團79萬6250股歸她所有。
Tinehay Holdings Limited
International House, Castle Hill
Victoria Road, Douglas
Isle of Man IM2 4RB
Kien Huat Realty Sdn Berhad
21st Floor, Wisma Genting
Jalan Sultan Ismail
50250 Kuala Lumpur
稱委託持股才是股份受益者
她要求法庭宣判，建發實業只是受到委託持股，她因此有權獲得股份收益，包括股息、附加股及紅利。
此外，林秀瓊也要求，建發實業於14天內將股份轉讓至她的名下，否則她將向建發實業及林國泰索賠20億6000萬令吉，或法庭所宣判的賠償。
粗略計算，79萬6250股僅占雲頂集團37億2000萬股的0.02%，相等於市價771萬令吉。可是，若加上雲頂集團派發的股息、紅利及股票分割，價值或會更高。（光明日報）
Kien Huat Realty Sdn Berhad (“Kien Huat”) 39.44% + 0.24 %= 39.68% !!!
[size=14.994px]2016-10-08 17:42
云顶家族争产风波．林国泰遭3侄子女起诉[size=14.994px]云顶集团的林氏家族掀争产风波，部份家族信托基金受益人遭除名，丹斯里林国泰及拿督林致华遭大哥拿督林致强的3名儿女起诉。
[size=14.994px]
[size=14.994px]
（吉隆坡8日讯）云顶（GENTING,3182,主板贸服组）集团的林氏家族掀争产风波，部份家族信托基金受益人遭除名，丹斯里林国泰及拿督林致华遭大哥拿督林致强的3名儿女起诉。 [size=14.994px]广告
林致强在2014年离开人世，他是云顶已故创办人丹斯里林梧桐的大儿子，林国泰与林致华则是林梧桐的二儿子和小儿子。 3人被取消家族信托基金受益权 根据《The Edge》获得的法庭文件显示，林致强孩子林强耀、林强河和及林淑玲（皆音译）3人提出诉讼，起诉他们的叔叔，主要是林致强的遗嘱问题，3人在家族信托基金受益人资格遭取消。 起诉书认为有关取消是不合法的；而林国泰和林致华则辩称，有关起诉毫无根据。 林梧桐在1996年设立了6项基金会，主要是为了6名孩子分别设立了林致强、林国泰、林致华、林秀丽、林秀莲及林秀琼信托基金。林致强在2014年逝世前一个月，设立了遗嘱，并由林国泰与林致华执行该遗嘱。 林强耀与林强河并不名列信托基金受益人。此外，林致强把10%的财产分配给他们的母亲陈美玉，10%分配给林淑玲，但大部份是分给林致强和方女士的儿女，其中60%分配给儿子林强伟，女儿林淑燕（皆音译）分得20%。 林致强一共有5个孩子，分别为林强耀、林强河、林淑玲、 林强伟与林淑燕(第2任妻子的孩子)。 林国泰与林致华表示，林致强在逝世以前曾表示，他本身与林强耀与林强河关系并不太亲密。 林国泰也表示，林强耀在林致强葬礼前一天，才从香港回来，而林强河则是在林国泰的要求下，才去探望父亲林致强。
Genting family dispute: Grandson wins 2nd round
October 19, 2016 News Update
The family feud between the sons and three grandchildren of Genting Bhd founder, the late Tan Sri Lim Goh Tong, has certainly captured the attention and interest of the corporate community.
In the latest development, the Court of Appeal yesterday ordered the disclosure of the Tee Keong Family Trust deed. This is a discretionary trust set up by Goh Tong in 1990 for his son, the late Datuk Lim Tee Keong, and his family.
“The Court of Appeal has today (yesterday) upheld the High Court’s decision to order that the trustee of the Tee Keong Family Trust, Infoline Sdn Bhd, disclose the trust deed to Benjamin Lim,” said Jeffrey Lee, a lawyer with Messrs Ranjit Singh & Yeoh, the firm representing Benjamin Lim Keong Hoe against Infoline for the disclosure of the trust deed.
Keong Hoe is the son of Tee Keong. His uncle Datuk Lim Chee Wah is a director and shareholder of Infoline.
“The disclosure of the deed has to be done within 14 days from today (yesterday),” added Lee.
The Edge weekly, in its Oct 10-16 edition, reported that Keong Hoe and his sister Marie Lim Seok Leng were removed as “discretionary beneficiaries” of the trust.
According to the report, Keong Hoe found out in August 2014 that he had been removed as a beneficiary of the family trust, from the trustee’s reply to his request for a copy of the trust deed in July 2014 to ascertain his and his children’s rights and entitlements.
He was not informed of the removal and objected to the removal, demanding a copy of the trust deed via an email in October 2014. Not receiving any response, he commenced legal proceedings.
According to the report, Keong Hoe only found out in January last year that his removal as a beneficiary of the family trust was with effect from March 18, 2014, just a month before Tee Keong passed away.
In December 2015, Seok Leng wrote to the trustee to obtain a copy of the trust accounts. With no response from the trustee, she wrote in again, giving a deadline to reply by Jan 18, 2016, five days after her request. The trustee’s silence resulted in Seok Leong commencing legal action, only to discover her removal as a beneficiary of the family trust.
Infoline said that it has no obligation under the discretionary trust to inform Keong Hoe and Seok Leong of their removal as beneficiaries nor to disclose the reasons.
The High Court, during the same month (December 2015), ordered the trustee to provide the discretionary trust deed to the court for review before ruling in favour of Keong Hoe, ordering the trustee to disclose the trust deed to him.
The Court of Appeal — represented by a three-member panel comprising Datuk Rohana Yusuf, Tan Sri Idrus Harun and Datuk Mary Lim Thiam Sun — yesterday upheld the High Court’s ruling. The defendants are entitled to another round of appeal if they apply for leave to appeal at the Federal Court.
The ruling in this matter could set the stage for other legal suits that have been taken against the two uncles, Kok Thay and Chee Wah.
Infoline is the trustee of the Tee Keong Family Trust, while Amaline (M) Sdn Bhd succeeded Goh Tong as the guardian and appointor of the trust upon Goh Tong’s death. Kok Thay, who is the chairman and chief executive of Genting Bhd, is also a director and shareholder of Amaline, who has the power to appoint and dismiss the trustee as well as the right to inform and approve decisions made by the trustees.
Keong Hoe and Seok Leng contend in their suits against Infoline and Chee Wah that the Tee Keong Family Trust was created and established for the benefit of Tee Keong, his family members, including the plaintiffs, as well as his descendants.
The disclosure of the trust deed may allow insight into the details of the trust, and help determine if there has been misuse of power in the removal of Keong Hoe and Seok Leong as beneficiaries of the family trust.
|
评分
-
查看全部评分
|
本周最热论坛帖子
发表于 9-4-2017 02:33 AM
变色卡
千斤顶
发表于 9-4-2017 09:34 AM
.gif)
楼主
2568 
43
