舉債來投資 MEGAN 值得嗎 ? （八）

khliew7

原帖由 阴谋师 于 10-3-2007 03:05 PM 发表


　　英保良集团曾是本地首屈一指的百货公司，上世纪70年代末80年代初高峰时期，在本地拥有32家百货公司，马来西亚30家，香港7家，并在本地开设有4家东方酒楼和1家泰国海鲜酒楼。20年前，公司在经济大衰退中 ...

从分析MEAGN开始，
到调查CD生产线的价格，
和许多子论坛都有你的发表，
可见你真的学识广阔，
博学多才，
不才越来越觉得，
阴谋兄深不可测

不正不正

感觉这贴可以称为 "MEGAN之风云",来这里就像追着连续剧一样精彩,希望结局是皆大欢喜

hc.goh

Titan 的 D/E Ratio = 0.88
=borrowing/weighted ordinary share
对不对 ？
Is it 0.88 is consider veri high?

latfa

111111111111

[ 本帖最后由 latfa 于 10-3-2007 06:59 PM 编辑 ]

yeowtk

megan已谈了两三年，真是也来也精彩！

alfredfx

原帖由 阴谋师 于 10-3-2007 12:57 AM 发表


根据我事后收到的消息，炒家是２０００年台湾改朝换代后，从台湾外逃出来的资金。可能台湾庄家在台湾疯惯了，来到马来西亚也不改本色。

９３，９４年的大牛市，好像也有很多台湾资金在兴风做浪。

抄家是香港人，资金是香港的

该窝轮要到期

stersew

原帖由 不正不正 于 10-3-2007 03:49 PM 发表
感觉这贴可以称为 "MEGAN之风云",来这里就像追着连续剧一样精彩,希望结局是皆大欢喜

哈啊啊！！！有同感，希望如你说言！

Mr.Business

差一点进不了这帖了，哈。。。
事情好像变得复杂了。。

小火

想问一下，为什么把这帖设为阅读权限 3？
难道新人没资格参与讨论？

Mr.Business

Brahmal Vasudevan currently serves as General Partner of ChrysCapital II, LLC and
Managing Director of ChrysCapital Investment Advisors [S] Pte Ltd, which manages and advises various ChrysCapital funds including ChrysCapital II, LLC. Mr. Vasudevan has held both positions since 2000.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Use Proper Titles for Investment Professionals
In the early days of venture capital and private equity, many investment professionals were bona fide "general partners." Often, a fund was structured as a limited partnership with a general partnership (consisting of the Firm's investment professionals) as the fund's general partner.
Today, it is rare for a Firm's investment professionals to be bona fide general partners. Often, a fund's general partner will be a limited liability company, of which the investment professionals are "managing members" or "managing directors." Sometimes, a fund's general partner is itself a limited partnership, of which the investment professionals are both limited partners and the owners of a corporation or limited liability company that serves as the general partner of the general partner. These types of structures are created by Firm counsel in order to (among other reasons) protect investment professionals from unlimited personal liability for the Firm's debts and obligations.
Notwithstanding the efforts of Firm counsel, investment professionals may be held liable as general partners if they lead third parties to believe that they are, in fact, general partners. A public website that declares specific individuals to be "general partners" may be strong evidence supporting a third party claim. For this reason, it is safest to use titles that are consistent with the Firm's underlying legal structure. Examples of such titles include: "managing director," "managing member," "managing principal," and "investment professional."

http://www.wsgr.com/PDFSearch/2557742_5.pdf

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fund principal

As a Fund Principal, you will play a vital role in originating and screening new investment opportunities, managing and monitoring existing fund investments, assisting with trading activities, execution of public to private transactions etc

http://jobs.efinancialcareers.com.au/job-4000000000234935.htm

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

http://www.millernash.com/showarticle.aspx?Show=348

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[ 本帖最后由 Mr.Business 于 11-3-2007 07:08 PM 编辑 ]

c56733

请版主修改权限。。。。

[ 本帖最后由 c56733 于 11-3-2007 04:37 PM 编辑 ]

dickson

差一点进不了这帖了
为什么把这帖设为阅读权限 3???

lim2000

是谁改去阅读权限 3的呢?

阴谋师

阅读权限 3---无事又生非???

bizceo

阅读权限 3- 版主， 你没事找事做？冷血的版主， 你想夺走新手学习投资的机会吗？让新手无法在投资的社会立足，是否太自私了？

Mr.Business

What Is The Difference Between "Venture Capital" and " Private Equity" ?

Question: You guys talk about Private Equity (PE) and Venture Capital Funds (VC). What’s the difference?

Our Take: Well, you “caught us.” Technically, VC is a subset of PE. Private Equity deals are simply deals that aren’t available for public participation. This includes VC, angel investing, hedge funds, buy out funds, etc.
The definition of all of these terms is getting more blurry, as each of them has morphed a bit to play in each other’s sandbox. For instance, angel investors now compete with VCs on small, very early stage deals, while some of the buyout and hedge funds are doing larger VC-type deals.
Traditionally, the term “venture capital” was used to designate investments in early “start up” companies. These deals were generally regarded as too high-risk and too early in their life cycles to interest other PE players.

http://www.askthevc.com/2007/02/what_is_the_difference_between.php

What Do VC Titles Mean?

Question: What is a "venture partner” and how do they compare to a “Partner” and / or “Managing Director?” And what exactly is a “Principal?” How are each compensated?

Our Take: Titles have widely varied meanings in the VC world. Unlike most other professions, there aren’t hard “rules” about what means what. But here goes…

- “Managing Director” / “General Partner” (MDs / GPs): In whatever VC organization you are dealing with, this is the top of the food chain. The titles mean effectively the same things, but many lawyers get nervous letting their clients use the term “General Partner” because this term equates to unlimited personal liability in the partnership paradigm. Therefore, the term “Managing Director” is used. Rest assured that all of them refer to each other as “partners” in conversation.  MDs and GPs are compensated through management fees and receive direct carry in the funds. They essentially run the firm, engage in fundraising and vote on the deals the firm considers executing. Note, that some larger firms have smaller committees of MDs / GPs that wield most or all of the power.

- “Venture Partner” / “Partner” (VPs): This is generally the next step down the ladder, but not always. In most organizations, Venture Partners / Partners source new deals, sit on boards and act in the eyes of start-up companies just like MDs and GPs. In contrast, VPs may not have carry in the funds themselves, rather deal-specific carry for companies in which they are involved in. In some firms, however, they do have general fund carry. What's most interesting is that some VPs are really MDs in training, while others are folks who just don’t want to be an MD, or are explicitly only intending to be at the VC for a finite period of time. At some firms, MDs / GPs who have “retired” (either voluntarily or involuntarily) are made VPs. In other words this position can be a position “on the way up,” “on the way down / out,” or “just hanging out for a while.” VPs can or can not make a salary off of the management fees. We’ve seen ranges from $50,000 a year on up to several hundreds of thousands of dollars. It can also be a full or part time position. You see everyone from young bucks trying to make their way up the ladder, to seasoned company executives becoming first time investors. Whatever the case, you rarely see these folks having another job (full-time operation roles at companies) while they are working for the VC firm.

- “Principal / Associates”: As with VPs, this functional responsibilities of Principals and Associates can range from “number crunching deal monkeys” to folks who source deals, sit on boards and act as junior partners. At some firms, the role of Principal immediately preceeds the role of Managing Director. Generally, they are younger folks who are learning the ropes and depending on the firm will each have their own level of autonomy and compensation. Rarely do they have a vote in deals and it’s probably about 50% of them who have direct fund carry. They are compensated through management fees, as most of them are still trying to pay off their business school loans.

http://www.askthevc.com/2006/12/what_do_vc_titles_mean.php

ckfan81

看来版主有必要说点话吧。。。不然会有很多不满的声音。
唉呀。。离题了。。。这里是讨论megan的叻。。。

kitkatlow

如果沒弄錯的話，這是另一位版主的意思。
這或許涉及到某些原因，相信他會儘快把理由告訴大家。

大家就等他的公告吧。

有人讨论见不得光的东西吗???
还是这个帖的页数飙升得太快??

莫非MEGAN好事近鸟???

若冉

或许可能是帖主人的意思

毕竟这个帖已经分割过一次了