【PBSB 5231 交流专区】（前名 PELIKAN ）

goodluck88

说出来看看，让大家帮你分忧。。。

chengyk

我看到 Pelikan 有几单官司，赔偿额高达 9 千万。虽然管理层很有信心可以解决，可是一但解决不到，Pelikan 的未来的盈利将会被这个官司吃掉。。。

[ 本帖最后由 chengyk 于 3-6-2009 04:38 PM 编辑 ]

花生包

9千万不是小数目来的哦！！有点可怕，不然就换去zelan好了。

fabregas81

不如把消息放出去，
等下明天表演插水

klagigi

A12. Contingent Liabilities

(a) In the ordinary course of business, the business of PHH and GHAG groups (dealing

with manufacturing and distribution of hardcopy related products and printer

consumables such as inkjet and toner cartridges, thermal transfer, office media

and impact cartridges, hereinafter referred to as the “Hardcopy business”) is

involved in several lawsuits. In particular, the Group has several large legal claims

brought by Original Equipment Manufacturers for perceived breach of patents

with an assessed potential maximum exposure of EUR20.3 million (RM97.9

million). The Group is of the view that litigation matters are an inherent part of

the Hardcopy business. Historically, the Group has been successful in defending

most cases and management remains confident that the Group's exposure to

these claims can be reduced or can be successfully defended. In the opinion of the

management, the lawsuits, claims and proceedings which are pending against the

Group will not have a material effect on the Group’s financial statements.

(b) Based on the latest actuaries assumptions as at 30 September 2008, PHH’s wholly

owned subsidiary Pelikan Hardcopy Scotland Limited (“PHSL”)’s retirement fund

has GBP15.6 million (RM80.96 million) assets to meet pension liabilities of

GBP24.7 million (RM128.2 million). An amount of GBP1.6 million (RM8.5 million)

has been recognised as a pension liability in the financial statements of PHSL as at

31 March 2009 in accordance with the Financial Reporting Standard 119 –

Employee Benefits (“FRS 119”).

The Group believes that the operational cash flow of the Group and the assets in

the retirement fund of PHSL are sufficient to meet the payouts of the retirement

scheme in the foreseeable future.

chengyk

其实也不是什么特别消息，季报都有写的，只是大部分人都不去看罢了。。。

klagigi

原帖由 fabregas81 于 3-6-2009 05:37 PM 发表
不如把消息放出去，
等下明天表演插水

已经在这里公布了还不算已经把消息放出去了吗？

fabregas81

看来每到一个新页就卡，到底是什么原理呢？

twsee007

原帖由 chengyk 于 3-6-2009 04:37 PM 发表
我看到 Pelikan 有几单官司，赔偿额高达 9 千万。虽然管理层很有信心可以解决，可是一但解决不到，Pelikan 的未来的盈利将会被这个官司吃掉。。。

what case?

ss24

偷鸡小赚３００免费股。。。

fabregas81

kakakaaakakaka

fabregas81

:@ :@ :@ :@ :@ :@ :@ :@ :@

fabregas81

last kakakaa

[ 本帖最后由 fabregas81 于 3-6-2009 06:25 PM 编辑 ]

fabregas81

.............每页需要有十五个废贴来破卡。。?

klagigi

明天继续起。。

弹煮

我看这单官司胜算不高
大家赶快走鬼阿！
马股又不是只得pelikan一支股！

chengyk

原帖由 twsee007 于 3-6-2009 05:52 PM 发表


what case?

A12. Contingent Liabilities
(a) In the ordinary course of business, the business of PHH and GHAG groups (dealing
with manufacturing and distribution of hardcopy related products and printer
consumables such as inkjet and toner cartridges, thermal transfer, office media
and impact cartridges, hereinafter referred to as the “Hardcopy business”) is
involved in several lawsuits. In particular, the Group has several large legal claims
brought by Original Equipment Manufacturers for perceived breach of patents
with an assessed potential maximum exposure of EUR20.3 million (RM97.9
million). The Group is of the view that litigation matters are an inherent part of
the Hardcopy business. Historically, the Group has been successful in defending
most cases and management remains confident that the Group's exposure to
these claims can be reduced or can be successfully defended. In the opinion of the
management, the lawsuits, claims and proceedings which are pending against the
Group will not have a material effect on the Group’s financial statements.

被 OEM 商告。。。

chengyk

你真的是一时一样。管理层都有信心告不成，你却这样有信心告得成。。。

pcmont

原帖由 弹煮 于 3-6-2009 10:28 PM 发表
我看这单官司胜算不高
大家赶快走鬼阿！
马股又不是只得pelikan一支股！

你失业了多久？
弹煮小姐！

twsee007

SAN FRANCISCO: Intel Corp. was fined a record US$1.45 billion by the European Union on Wednesday for using strong-arm sales tactics in the computer chip market - a penalty that could turn up the pressure on U.S. regulators to go after the company, too.

The fine against the world's biggest chip maker represents a huge victory for Intel's Silicon Valley rival, Advanced Micro Devices Inc., or AMD, the No. 2 supplier of microprocessors to PC makers.

AMD has sued Intel and lobbied regulators around the world for the past five years, complaining that Intel was penalizing PC makers in the U.S. and abroad for doing business with AMD.

Although the U.S. Federal Trade Commission is also investigating, AMD seems to have found its most sympathetic ear in Europe.

EU Competition Commissioner Neelie Kroes said Intel has harmed millions of European consumers by "deliberately acting to keep competitors out of the market."

"Intel did not compete fairly, frustrating innovation and reducing consumer welfare in the process," she said.

The commission told Intel to immediately stop some sales practices in Europe, though it wouldn't say what those were.