|
|
发表于 6-12-2015 02:18 PM
|
显示全部楼层
26亿，杀人凶手这些事情按在他的头上，他都没有下台，试问还有什么事情可以逼到他狗急跳墙？ 
希望联盟咯，有选举就有机会赢有机会输。
对了，上次你不是言之凿凿说国阵下届会赢出槟城州政权，我有虚心请教你的分析滴，不懂可以让我茅塞顿开吗？
法令的出现自然是有他的需要性，因为发展嘛，向前走嘛，IS这些恐怖分子的威胁对普通人民的影响还是很大的，
虽然现在还控制的住IS，可是偶尔还是会发生好像沙巴的事件的，说不定等下土耳其士兵就突然攻击马来西亚了，（土耳其最喜欢攻击远方和他没有关系的国家，比如朝鲜，澳洲这些）
如果NSC是为了反恐的话，那今年四月搞的Prevention of Terrorism Act 2015难道是搞爽的？ 才半年前而已哦 （http://www.searcct.gov.my/images/pdf/pota/POTA_en.pdf）
而且反对党一向喜欢夸大事情的严重性，
比如之前的煽动法令，不是说你只要上网说反政府的言论就会被提控？
结果现在还不是和以前一样，喜欢在网上说什么就什么。
不多说，看link。
http://www.themalaymailonline.co ... verdict-on-facebook
http://english.astroawani.com/ma ... lder-sedition-82611
现在这个法令一出，反对党又来夸大，
政府要充公你的财产就充公，政府要杀你就杀你，
我说华人很多都是贪生怕死，你们这样恐吓他们，说不定会来一个反效果，他们还是一样会讨厌政府，但是想到有这个法令，投票的时候也不敢投反对党了，怕被查到然后政府要充公他们的财产就充公，你们说的，这个法令要充公谁的财产就充公嘛，要杀谁就杀谁嘛。
希望听到你专业的意见打脸律师公会。
http://www.malaysianbar.org.my/
The Malaysian Bar is alarmed by the proposed National Security Council Bill 2015 (“the Bill”) that was tabled in the Dewan Rakyat on 1 December 2015 by Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Dato’ Seri Shahidan Kassim, and which is reportedly scheduled for its second reading today. The basis for this new law is unclear, and the manner in which it is being rushed through the Dewan Rakyat is inexcusable.
The Bill is an insidious piece of legislation that confers and concentrates vast executive powers in a newly created statutory body called the National Security Council (“NSC”).
The NSC consists of key members of the executive, namely the Prime Minister as Chairman and the Deputy Prime Minister as Deputy Chairman, as well as the Minister of Defence, Minister of Home Affairs, Minister of Communication and Multimedia, Chief Secretary to the Government, Chief of Defence Forces, and the Inspector General of Police (see Clause 6). It is noteworthy that the members of the NSC are all appointed by the Prime Minister and report directly to him. Accordingly, the NSC is not an independent body, and would essentially function at the dictates of the Prime Minister.
The NSC is to be “the Government’s central authority for considering matters concerning national security” (see Clause 3). The NSC’s scope of authority is broad and unchecked, as “national security” is not defined in the Bill. This provision is therefore open to abuse by the NSC, as the NSC would be able to treat almost any matter as one of national security for the purposes of the Bill.
The NSC will have the power to “control” and “issue directives” to “any ministry, department, office, agency, authority, commission, committee, board or council of the Federal Government, or of any of the State Governments, established under any written law or otherwise” on operations or matters concerning national security (see Clauses 2 and 5). Thus, a whole host of instrumentalities of the Federal Government or State Governments — which could include Bank Negara Malaysia, Securities Commission and the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission — would be made subservient to the NSC. The independence of these entities would be restrained and compromised. The authority of State Governments can be overridden.
Critically, the NSC is empowered to advise the Prime Minister to declare any area in Malaysia as a “security area” if the NSC is of the view that the security in that area is “seriously disturbed or threatened by any person, matter or thing which causes or is likely to cause
|
|
本周最热论坛帖子
楼主
2790 
171
