查看: 1113|回复: 8
|
一个霹雳州宪法。。。。。。
[复制链接]
|
|
一个霹雳州宪法。。。。。。
可是为什么那么多种说法???
一边说宪法里苏丹有权辞退州务大臣。。。。
一边却说不能???
到底他们有没有读或看过或了解过宪法???
还是有人歪曲宪法??? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 21-5-2009 04:32 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 21-5-2009 04:37 PM
|
显示全部楼层
一句话 ISA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 21-5-2009 04:42 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 21-5-2009 08:48 PM
|
显示全部楼层
如果当初写霹雳州宪法的那几条友仔还没有死,你可以去问他们为什么写出这么 ong dog dog 的州宪法。。
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 21-5-2009 11:12 PM
|
显示全部楼层
Article 72, Clause (1) of the Federal Constitution clearly states:
72.(1) The validity of any proceedings in the Legislative Assembly of
any State shall not be questioned in any court.
结果还不是闹上法庭,马来西亚宪法是用来维护BN的啦~
[ 本帖最后由 泰美思の觉醒 于 21-5-2009 11:14 PM 编辑 ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 22-5-2009 09:51 PM
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 泰美思の觉醒 于 21-5-2009 11:12 PM 发表
Article 72, Clause (1) of the Federal Constitution clearly states:
72.(1) The validity of any proceedings in the Legislative Assembly of
any State shall not be questioned in any court.
结果还不 ...
争议点是:特权委员会的 proceedings,可否算是any proceedings in the Legislative Assembly? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 23-5-2009 02:58 PM
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 2750廿三号 于 22-5-2009 09:51 PM 发表
争议点是:特权委员会的 proceedings,可否算是any proceedings in the Legislative Assembly?
select committee 是 subset to State Assembly, 能夠质問 select committee 的只有 state assembly.
人民如果不同意 state assembly 的作法,只有通过大選,这就是民主制衡的 mechanism. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 28-5-2009 10:25 AM
|
显示全部楼层
The Constitution of The State of Perak:-
12. Appointment of Mentri Besar.
( 1 ) His Royal Highness shall appoint by instrument under his [subs. ~ n .
sign manual and State Seal, a Menteri Besar pursuant to paragraph 4/961
(a) of Clause 2 of Article 16.
(2) No person shall be appointed to be Mentri Besar unless he is
ofthe Malay race and professes the Muslim Religion:
严格来说,这第12(2)条文已经算是含有“种族及宗教歧视”的成分存在 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
本周最热论坛帖子
|