查看: 4489|回复: 6
|
没有地契。要Assignment
[复制链接]
|
|
各位大大。
请问在什么情况下回没有地契?
loan agreement cum assignment 和 loan assignment and deed of assignment的分别是?
absolute assignment 和 assignment(way of charge)的分别是?
[ 本帖最后由 lexson87 于 21-6-2008 01:31 AM 编辑 ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 21-6-2008 02:21 PM
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 lexson87 于 21-6-2008 01:30 AM 发表 ![](http://cforum.cari.com.my/images/common/back.gif)
各位大大。
请问在什么情况下回没有地契?
loan agreement cum assignment 和 loan assignment and deed of assignment的分别是?
absolute assignment 和 assignment(way of charge)的分别是?
loan agreement cum assignment is borrower & purchaser is the same party...
loan assignment and deed of assignment is borrower is u n purchaser or owner = 3rd party |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![](static/image/common/ico_lz.png)
楼主 |
发表于 21-6-2008 02:24 PM
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 Nasi_lemak 于 21-6-2008 02:21 PM 发表 ![](http://chinese.cari.com.my/myforum/images/common/back.gif)
loan agreement cum assignment is borrower & purchaser is the same party...
loan assignment and deed of assignment is borrower is u n purchaser or owner = 3rd party
什么情况borrower and purchaser是不同人?可以给个例子吗? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 21-6-2008 03:50 PM
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 Nasi_lemak 于 21-6-2008 02:21 PM 发表 ![](http://chinese.cari.com.my/myforum/images/common/back.gif)
loan agreement cum assignment is borrower & purchaser is the same party...
loan assignment and deed of assignment is borrower is u n purchaser or owner = 3rd party
你解释错了。
分别只是不同银行有不同的名称而已。 就好像有些银行叫贷款合约为Loan Agreement, 有些是Facility Agreement.
Loan agreement cum assignment是UOB的文件, 其他bank很多都是分开的。
ALLIANCE才有不同的DEED OF ASSIGNMENT, 即是1st & 3rd party之分。 其他银行有些是公用的, 但是里面有分两种, 1st or 3rd party在不同的页数而已。
Absolute assignment也是一个名称而已, 好像是AMBANK在用。
其实它的意思都是同一种文件。 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 21-6-2008 03:51 PM
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 lexson87 于 21-6-2008 01:30 AM 发表 ![](http://chinese.cari.com.my/myforum/images/common/back.gif)
各位大大。
请问在什么情况下回没有地契?
loan agreement cum assignment 和 loan assignment and deed of assignment的分别是?
absolute assignment 和 assignment(way of charge)的分别是?
不是没有地契, 只是分层地契还没有出, 所以我们说without title也等于under master title. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 21-10-2008 11:28 AM
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 秀气灵人 于 21-6-2008 03:51 PM 发表 ![](http://cforum4.cari.com.my/images/common/back.gif)
不是没有地契, 只是分层地契还没有出, 所以我们说without title也等于under master title.
without title 不等于是 under master title!
without title 是最没保障的! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 21-10-2008 01:38 PM
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 AndyFei 于 21-10-2008 11:28 AM 发表 ![](http://cforum1.cari.com.my/images/common/back.gif)
without title 不等于是 under master title!
without title 是最没保障的!
Bar council给我们的文件都只是以with or without title来区别。 common sense with title等于有分层地契, without等于是master title. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
本周最热论坛帖子
|